IsarMathLib

In the MetricSpace_ZF we show how a single (ordered loop valued) pseudometric defines a uniformity. In this theory we extend this to the situation where we have an arbitrary collection of pseudometrics, all defined on the the same set \(X\) and valued in an ordered loop \(L\). Since real numbers form an ordered loop all the results proven in this theory are true for the standard real-valued pseudometrics.

Suppose \(\mathcal{M}\) is a collection of (an ordered loop valued) pseudometrics on \(X\), i.e. \(d:X\times X\rightarrow L^+\) is a pseudometric for every \(d\in \mathcal{M}\). Then, for each \(d\in \mathcal{M}\) the sets \(\{ d^{-1}(\{c\in L^+: c\leq b\}): b \in L_+ \}\) form a fundamental system of entourages (see MetricSpace_ZF).

The next two definitions describe the way a common fundamental system of entourages for \(\mathcal{M}\) is constructed. First we take finite subset \(M\) of \(\mathcal{M}\). Then we choose \(f:M\rightarrow L_+\). This way for each \(d\in M\) the value \(f(d)\) is a positive element of \(L\) and \(\{d^{-1}(\{c\in L^+: c\leq f(d)\}): d\in M\}\) is a finite collection of subsets of \(X\times X\). Then we take intersections of such finite collections as \(M\) varies over \(\mathcal{M}\) and \(f\) varies over all possible function mapping \(M\) to \(L_+\). To simplify notation for this construction we split it into two steps. In the first step we define a collection of finite intersections resulting from choosing a finite set of pseudometrics \(M\), \(f:M\rightarrow L_+\) and varying the selector function \(f\) over the space of functions mapping \(M\) to the set of positive elements of \(L\).

In the second step we collect all uniform gauge sets defined above as parameter \(M\) vary over all nonempty finite subsets of \(\mathcal{M}\). This is the collection of sets that we will show forms a fundamental system of entourages.

The context muliple_pmetric is very similar to the pmetric_space context except that rather than fixing a single pseudometric \(d\) we fix a collection of pseudometrics \(\mathcal{M}\). That forces the notation for disk, topology, interior and closure to depend on the pseudometric \(d\).

Analogously what is done in the pmetric_space context we will write \( \text{UniformGauges}(X,L,A,r,\mathcal{M} ) \) as \( \mathfrak{B} \) in the muliple_pmetric context.

The next lemma just shows the definition of \(\mathfrak{B}\) in notation used in the muliple_pmetric.

\(\mathfrak{B}\) consists of (finite) intersections of sets of the form \(d^{-1}(\{c\in L^+:c\leq f(d)\})\) where \(f:M\rightarrow L_+\) some finite subset \(M\subseteq \mathcal{M}\). More precisely, if \(M\) is a nonempty finite subset of \(\mathcal{M}\) and \(f\) maps \(M\) to the positive set of the loop \(L\), then the set \(\bigcap_{d\in M} d^{-1}(\{c\in L^+:c\leq f(d)\}\) is in \(\mathfrak{B}\).

If \(d\) is one of the pseudometrics from \(\mathcal{M}\) then theorems proven in pmetric_space can are valid.

If \(d\) is member of any finite subset of \(\mathcal{M}\) then \(d\) maps \(X\times X\) to the nonnegative set of the ordered loop \(L\).

Members of the uniform gauge defined by multiple pseudometrics are subsets of \(X\times X\) i.e. relations on \(X\).

Suppose \(M_1\) is a subset of \(M\) and \(\mathcal{M}\). \(f_1,f\) map \(M_1\) and \(M\), resp. to \(L_+\) and \(f\leq f_1\) on \(M_1\). Then the set \(\bigcap_{d\in M} d^{-1}(\{y \in L_+: y\leq f(d)\})\) is included in the set \(\bigcap_{d\in M_1} d^{-1}(\{y \in L_+: y\leq f_1(d)\})\).

For any two sets \(B_1,B_2\) in \(\mathfrak{B}\) there exist a third one that is contained in both.

Sets in \(\mathfrak{B}\) contain the diagonal and are symmetric, hence contain a symmetric subset from \(\mathfrak{B}\).

\(\mathfrak{B}\) is a subset of the power set of \(\)X\times X$.

If \(\mathcal{M}\) and \(L_+\) are nonempty then \(\mathfrak{B}\) is also nonempty.

If the loop order is halfable then for every set \(B_1\in \mathfrak{B}\) there is another set \(B_2\in \mathfrak{B}\) such that \(B_2\circ B_2 \subseteq B_1\).